Self-Defense (Force)
Justified in using FORCE against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect against another's use or attempted use of unlawful force. Presumption of reasonableness if listed conditions are met.
To prove this offense, the State must establish each of the following elements: Reasonable belief; Force is immediately necessary; To protect against another's use or attempted use of unlawful force.
The base classification is Justification defense to prosecution, with possible enhancements depending on the conduct, victim, location, or prior history of the actor.
Elements you must prove
- Reasonable belief
- Force is immediately necessary
- To protect against another's use or attempted use of unlawful force
Justified in using FORCE against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect against another's use or attempted use of unlawful force. Presumption of reasonableness if listed conditions are met.
| If this condition applies… | Charge escalates to | Statute |
|---|---|---|
| Verbal provocation alone | NO justification | §9.31(b)(1) |
| Resisting lawful arrest/search (with §9.31(c) excessive-force exception) | NO justification | §9.31(b)(2) |
| Provocation by actor (unless actor abandons encounter) | NO justification | §9.31(b)(4) |
| Carrying weapon in violation of §46.02 / §46.05 while seeking discussion | NO justification | §9.31(b)(5) |
Practice 11 questions on this topic
Time yourself, score your run, review missed questions with statute references — Free Practice Pass cadets get limited access.
Worked examples
Under §9.31(a), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to:
- Get even for past harm
- Protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force Correct
- Make a citizen's arrest only
- Discipline a child
Under §9.31(b), use of force is NOT justified in which of the following?
- In response to verbal provocation alone
- When the actor consented to the exact force used or attempted
- When the actor provoked the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force, unless the actor abandons the encounter or clearly communicates intent to do so and the other persists
- All of the above Correct
Under §9.31(c), the use of force to resist an arrest or search is justified only if:
- The actor disagrees with the officer
- BEFORE the actor offers any resistance, the peace officer (or person acting at the officer's direction) uses or attempts to use greater force than necessary, AND when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect against the officer's use of greater force than necessary Correct
- The arrest is for a misdemeanor
- The actor was unaware of being arrested
Statutory definitions for this topic
- Immediately necessary Tex. Penal Code §§9.31, 9.32, 9.51
- Required at the present moment, with no reasonable opportunity to use lesser means, to prevent the threatened harm. The 'immediately necessary' standard governs the use of force under §§9.31, 9.32, 9.41, 9.42, and 9.51.
- Self-defense Tex. Penal Code §9.31
- A person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force.
- Provocation Tex. Penal Code §9.31(b)(4)
- An actor who provokes the other's use or attempted use of unlawful force forfeits self-defense — UNLESS the actor abandons the encounter (or clearly communicates intent to abandon) and the other persists in or threatens unlawful force.
- Resisting unlawful arrest (§9.31(c)) Tex. Penal Code §9.31(c)
- Force against an officer is justified ONLY if (1) BEFORE the actor offers any resistance, the officer (or person at the officer's direction) uses or attempts to use greater force than necessary, AND (2) the actor reasonably believes force is immediately necessary to protect against the officer's excess.