Use of Force & Arrest · §9.05

Reckless Injury of Innocent Third Person

Reckless Injury of Innocent Third Person is covered under §9.05 and tested on the TCOLE peace officer licensing exam. Cadets typically encounter this topic under "Framework" on practice exams.

To prove this offense, the State must establish each of the following elements: Underlying force was justified against the original target; Actor recklessly injures or kills an innocent third person; Justification does not extend to that injury.

Elements you must prove

  • Underlying force was justified against the original target
  • Actor recklessly injures or kills an innocent third person
  • Justification does not extend to that injury

Practice 3 questions on this topic

Time yourself, score your run, review missed questions with statute references — Free Practice Pass cadets get limited access.

Start Free Practice

Worked examples

Worked example 1

Under §9.05 (Reckless Injury of Innocent Third Person), even if the actor was justified in using force or deadly force, his use of force is not justified if it:

  1. Was not careful enough
  2. Recklessly injures or kills an innocent third person Correct
  3. Frightened bystanders
  4. Caused property damage
Why: Even when self-defense or another justification applies, the actor remains responsible for reckless harm to innocent third persons (e.g., a stray bullet that strikes a bystander).
Statute: Tex. Penal Code §9.05
Worked example 2

Under §9.05 'Reckless Injury of Innocent Third Person,' if a justified actor recklessly hits a bystander with a stray bullet:

  1. He is automatically not liable for the injury
  2. His use of force was justified as to the original target, BUT the actor is not protected against criminal liability for the recklessly inflicted injury to the innocent third person Correct
  3. He must surrender his weapon
  4. He is automatically liable for murder
Why: Justification covers the original target only. The actor remains responsible for any recklessly inflicted harm to bystanders.
Statute: Tex. Penal Code §9.05
Worked example 3

Under §9.05 (Reckless Injury), the rule applies even when the underlying force was justified. This means:

  1. Justification is unlimited
  2. An actor lawfully using force is still criminally liable for any harm to innocent bystanders that flows from his RECKLESS conduct (e.g., reckless aim, firing into a crowd) Correct
  3. Bystanders' injuries are always justified
  4. Justification covers all harm caused
Why: §9.05 limits the scope of justification: the actor's lawful force does not protect him from liability for reckless harm to innocent persons. This is a critical limitation in self-defense scenarios with crowds or bystanders.
Statute: Tex. Penal Code §9.05

Statutory definitions for this topic

Reckless injury of innocent third person Tex. Penal Code §9.05
Even when the actor was justified in using force or deadly force against the original target, the actor remains criminally liable for harm RECKLESSLY inflicted on innocent third persons (e.g., a stray bullet striking a bystander).