Use of Force & Arrest · §9.22
Necessity
Necessity is covered under §9.22 and tested on the TCOLE peace officer licensing exam. Cadets typically encounter this topic under "Framework" on practice exams.
To prove this offense, the State must establish each of the following elements: Reasonable belief conduct is immediately necessary; To avoid imminent harm; Desirability/urgency clearly outweighs the harm sought to be prevented; No legislative purpose to exclude the defense.
Elements you must prove
- Reasonable belief conduct is immediately necessary
- To avoid imminent harm
- Desirability/urgency clearly outweighs the harm sought to be prevented
- No legislative purpose to exclude the defense
Practice 1 question on this topic
Time yourself, score your run, review missed questions with statute references — Free Practice Pass cadets get limited access.
Worked examples
Worked example 1
'Necessity' under §9.22 is a justification when:
- The actor had any reason to act
- The actor reasonably believes the conduct is immediately necessary to avoid imminent harm; the desirability and urgency of avoiding the harm clearly outweigh, according to ordinary standards of reasonableness, the harm sought to be prevented; AND a legislative purpose to exclude the justification claimed does not otherwise plainly appear Correct
- The actor was ordered to act
- Only peace officers may invoke it
Why: Necessity has three elements: reasonable belief of imminent need, balance of harm in favor of conduct, and no legislative purpose to exclude the defense.
Statute: Tex. Penal Code §9.22
Statutory definitions for this topic
- Necessity Tex. Penal Code §9.22
- A justification when the actor reasonably believes the conduct is immediately necessary to avoid imminent harm; the desirability and urgency of avoiding the harm clearly outweigh, by ordinary standards of reasonableness, the harm sought to be prevented; AND no legislative purpose to exclude the justification plainly appears.